Rob Rigby
I run operations and design the systems people work in. Below are three pieces of work from my current role and one of my own, each with the problem, what I built and what changed.
rigbyrob@gmail.comLinkedIn
How a research record got updated, before and after
The database behind a B2B data product, around 13,000 company records.
Before
Around 1,500 paper forms posted to freelance researchers
about 2 months
Completed forms posted on for data entry
about 1 month
Every record checked by hand against a 50-page guide
about 3 weeks
Database updated
Several months from start to usable data
After
Employed researcher works a record from their list in an online form
checks run as it is entered
Records gather into batches of around 100
about an hour
Five staged checks, each decided by a person
same day
Written back to the live database
Uploaded the same week, on the same staff hours
Rebuilding the research process
Monthly output went from around 400 records to around 1,500, on the same staff hours.
- The problem
- The oldest records had not been updated for five years, in a product sold as a live, managed database. Work went out on paper to freelancers whose output could not be measured, and nobody could see how big the backlog was.
- What I did
- Replaced the paper forms with an online research form that checks entries as they are made. Made the case for employing researchers instead of using freelancers, then recruited and inducted them. Split the database into priority bands by company size, so large companies are researched four times a year and the smallest once, and built a research calendar around it.
- Where AI helped
- I used AI tools as an aid to build the research site. The decisions about priority bands and how often each is researched were mine, based on which errors customers notice.
- Also
- Printing and postage of about £500 a cycle stopped.
Screenshot: research form, customer data removed
A checking platform that keeps people in charge
Checking moved from me alone, against a 50-page guide, to two senior researchers working a 3-page process.
- The problem
- Every record needed checking before it went live, and the only instructions were a 50-page manual that one person worked through by hand.
- What I did
- Designed a platform that takes a batch of around 100 records through five stages: data quality, comparing updates, refusals, companies that have gone, and completion. A person makes the decision at every stage; the platform tracks progress and makes sure nothing is skipped. A batch takes about an hour.
- Where AI helped
- AI tools helped me build it. The stages, and what is left to human judgement, came from how the checking actually worked.
Screenshot: batch progress view, customer data removed
Cashflow forecasting at short notice
A £20,000 shortfall found four months out, halved through supplier savings, and closed before it arrived.
- The problem
- The colleague who handled cashflow for two companies left at two weeks' notice, with little usable documentation. Nobody could say with confidence that staff and suppliers would be paid at month end.
- What I did
- Paused my other work, shared a first spreadsheet forecast within a day, then rebuilt it on the dates customers actually pay, working through twelve months of invoices and bank statements. That showed a gap caused by our largest customer moving to longer terms. Later I built a forecasting tool linked to our accounts software, including a fix for card payments that arrived in combined batches and were landing on the wrong dates.
- Result
- The directors now decide which suppliers to pay, and when, from evidence.
Screenshot: forecast view, figures removed
My own project: a job application tracker
Built for my own job search. It records every application, its closing date and outcome, and flags anything about to close.
Try the demo